The collection holds 321 photographs, 4 pages or documents and 1 event connected to this person. Dated 2019 to 2026 (295 items); 31 with no date. This is what has been collected and read so far, not every photograph ever taken.
326 items match; showing 241–300.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 56.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 56.3 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 75.5, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 75.5 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 69.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 69.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 66.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 66.2 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 56.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 56.1 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 68.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 68.6 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 71.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 71.2 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 59.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 59.6 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 68.5, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 68.5 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 77.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 77.4 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 69.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 69.3 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 62.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 62.6 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 65.7, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 65.7 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 69.5, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 69.5 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 73.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 73.2 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 70.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 70.3 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 72.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 72.4 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 61.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 61.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 69.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 69.4 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 64.0, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 64 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 68.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 68.2 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 69.7, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 69.7 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 71.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 71.6 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 64.7, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 64.7 (a score, not a probability).
The person is named in it: “The touring delegation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.”
The collection records the person at this event (leader and supervisor).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 65.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 65.3 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 70.0, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 70 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 65.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 65.2 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 62.9, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 62.9 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 70.9, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 70.9 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 66.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 66.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 63.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 63.4 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 69.0, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 69 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 55.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 55.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 74.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 74.2 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 58.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 58.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 68.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 68.6 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 60.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 60.1 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 68.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 68.2 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 56.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 56.1 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 55.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 55.3 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 57.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 57.4 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 62.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 62.3 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 62.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 62.1 (a score, not a probability).
The page “Driverless Cars, Drones, and Discovery: Prep School's Odyssey through China” mentions the person: “The touring delegation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Driverless Cars, Drones, and Discovery: Prep School's Odyssey through China” mentions the person: “The touring delegation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Driverless Cars, Drones, and Discovery: Prep School's Odyssey through China” mentions the person: “The touring delegation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Driverless Cars, Drones, and Discovery: Prep School's Odyssey through China” mentions the person: “The touring delegation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Driverless Cars, Drones, and Discovery: Prep School's Odyssey through China” mentions the person: “The touring delegation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Driverless Cars, Drones, and Discovery: Prep School's Odyssey through China” mentions the person: “The touring delegation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Driverless Cars, Drones, and Discovery: Prep School's Odyssey through China” mentions the person: “The touring delegation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Driverless Cars, Drones, and Discovery: Prep School's Odyssey through China” mentions the person: “The touring delegation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Driverless Cars, Drones, and Discovery: Prep School's Odyssey through China” mentions the person: “The touring delegation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Driverless Cars, Drones, and Discovery: Prep School's Odyssey through China” mentions the person: “The touring delegation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
A caption in “Preppy 25”, page 350 names the person: “L to R (Sitting): Abdur Rehman Azim, Ahmad Maqsood, Madam Naila (Staff Advisor), Raja Ashfaq Ahmad (Headmaster), Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil (Deputy Headmaster), Mian Mohammad Sikandar, Syed Mohammad Haris”
A caption in “Preppy 25”, page 115 names the person: “L to R (Sitting): Syed Irtaza Haroon, Mahad Mir, Mr. Moeed Khalid (Staff Advisor), Raja Ashfaq Ahmad (Headmaster), Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil (Deputy Headmaster), Ibadullah Khan, Ghazan Waheed Khan”
A caption in “Preppy 25”, page 176 names the person: “L to R : Muhammad Hanzala Sindhu, Azlan Ajaz Khan, Ms. Nida Manzoor Azeemi (Staff Advisor), Raja Ashfaq Ahmad (Headmaster), Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil (Deputy Headmaster), Hamza Talat, Syed M. Daud Abbas, Mustafa-ur-Rehman Khan”
A caption in “Preppy 25”, page 149 names the person: “L to R: Ch. M.Shaigan Murad, Syed Dure Muhammad Gardezi , Ms. Sarah Liu (HOD Chinese), Raja Ashfaq Ahmad (Headmaster), Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil (Deputy Headmaster), Hadeed Omar Rashid, Shahmeer Sikander, Ayan Zeshan.”
A caption in “poetica 2025”, page 2 names the person: “Poetica Editorial Board Group Photograph (Academic Session 2024-2025) L to R (Sitting) : Daud Arshad, Aahil Saleem Nasir, Mr. Faizan Haider (Staff Advisor), Dr. Syed Muhammad Turab Hussain (Principal), Raja Ashfaq Ahmad (Headmaster), Mr. Mu”