The collection holds 617 photographs, 116 pages or documents and 66 events connected to this person. Dated 2016 to 2026 (703 items); 96 with no date. This is what has been collected and read so far, not every photograph ever taken.
799 items match; showing 481–540.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 56.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 56.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 58.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 58.3 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 55.5, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 55.5 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 59.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 59.1 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 56.0, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 56 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 56.5, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 56.5 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 57.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 57.4 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 59.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 59.1 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 56.7, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 56.7 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 56.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 56.2 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 55.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 55.1 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 55.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 55.6 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 59.0, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 59 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 58.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 58.6 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 59.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 59.3 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 57.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 57.4 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 55.7, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 55.7 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 59.5, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 59.5 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 56.0, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 56 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 59.7, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 59.7 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 57.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 57.6 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 67.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 67.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 55.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 55.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 57.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 57.3 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 59.9, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 59.9 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 69.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 69.1 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 59.7, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 59.7 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 61.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 61.1 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 56.9, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 56.9 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 71.7, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 71.7 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 64.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 64.3 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 56.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 56.6 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 55.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 55.4 (a score, not a probability).
The person is named in it: “The Headmistress, Senior School, Ms. Amina Kamran, took the opportunity to announce the newly appointed Student Council.”
The collection records the person at this event (Headmistress, Senior School; announced the Student Council).
The person is named in it.
The collection records the person at this event (Headmistress, Senior School; attended).
The person is named in it: “…d | AC-Best Midfielder Abdullah Mursil | AC-Best Striker In the end, the worthy Principal, Dr S. M. Turab Hussain, Mr. Umer Zaman Khan, Gamesmaster & Head of Sports, and Miss Amina Kamran (HMSS) were full of praise and appreciation for both the ACOBA Football Team and the winners, the Aitchison College Football Team.”
The person is named in it: “Gracing the occasion were our worthy Principal, Dr. S. M. Turab Hussain, accompanied by Miss Amina Kamran, HMSS, and Mr. Umer Zaman Khan, Games Master & Head of Sports.”
The person wrote it: “…arch, 2026 Friday 9701 9231 9489 9084 Session-I Chemistry 4 Session-I Further Math 1 Session-I History 2 Session-II Law 4 2hrs 2hrs 1hr 45min 1hr 30min Ms. Fariha Ramzan Ms. Amina Kamran Controller Examinations Headmistress, Senior School”
The person wrote it: “…kistan St. 2hrs 30min Tarjuma Tul Quran 2hrs 30min 6th March, 2026 Friday Session - I Islamiyat 2hrs 30min Islamiyat 2hrs 30min Pakistan St. 2hrs 30min Ms. Fariha Ramzan Ms. Amina Kamran Controller Examinations Headmistress, Senior School Aitchison College, Lahore Senior School”
A caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”, page 8 names the person: “Standing Left to Right: Umair Gulzar (Assistant HM K&N), Jamal Malhi (Assistant HM Kelly), Muhammad Yaqoob (Assistant HM LJ), Muhammad Ali (Assistant HM Godley), Saleem Akhtar (Assistant HM Shirazi) Sitting Left to Right: Syed Shahmeer Raza”
The person is named in it: “Boarding Handbook Academic Year 2026-2027 Useful Contacts Name Designation Email Extension Amina Kamran Headmistress Senior School hmss@aitchison.edu.pk 213 Raja Ashfaq Headmaster Prep School hmps@aitchison.edu.pk 335 Fatima Mubeen Headmistress Junior School hmjs@aitchison…”
The person is named in it: “…to Right: Syed Shahmeer Raza (Housemaster K&N), Khalid Saifullah (Housemaster Kelly House), Muhammad Tariq (Housemaster Leslie Jones), Dr. S.M Turab Hussain (Principal), Amina Kamran (Headmistress Senior School), Zubair Ata (Housemaster Godley House), Iqbal Haider (Housemaster Shirazi House) 8”
The person is named in it: “Other esteemed guests included the Principal, Dr. S. M. Turab Hussain, the Bursar, Mr. Khalid Mohammad Noon, the Headmistress of the Senior School, Ms. Amina Kamran, the Deputy Headmaster of the Senior School, Dr. Mohammad Kamran; along with Heads of Departments, Housemasters, faculty members, and students.”
The collection records the person at this event (Headmistress, Senior School; guest).
The person is named in it: “…the honourable chief guest and Old Boy, Mr. Faheem Ahsan Jamil; members of the College leadership, including Bursar Mr. Khalid M. Noon and Headmistress of Senior School Ms. Amina Kamran; faculty members; and students, marking a formal evening of reflection and celebration.”
The collection records the person at this event (Headmistress, Senior School; attended).
The person is named in it: “The Principal, Dr. Syed Muhammad Turab Hussain, and the Headmistress Senior School, Ms. Amina Kamran, along with esteemed faculty members and students, were also in attendance.”
The collection records the person at this event (Headmistress, Senior School; attended).
The person is named in it: “Our worthy Principal, Dr S.M. Turab Hussain, the Senior School Headmistress, Ms Amina Kamran, and the Games Master, Mr Umer Zaman Khan, distributed trophies to the participants.”
The person is named in it: “The College was represented by Dr Turab Hussain (Principal), Khalid Noon (Bursar), Amina Kamran (Headmistress Senior School), and Faaria R Salahuddin (Director Advancements).”
The person wrote it: “Regards, Amina Kamran HMSS”
The collection records the person at this event (attendee (College representative)).
The person wrote it: “Regards, Amina Kamran HMSS”
The person is named in it: “The presence of the worthy Principal Dr. S.M Turab Hussain, the Senior School Headmistress, Ms. Amina Kamran and the Games Master, Mr. Umer Zaman Khan, added dignity to the occasion.”
The person is named in it: “In the end, Mr. Umer Zaman Khan (Head of Sports), Ms. Amina Kamran (HMSS), and our worthy Principal, Dr. S.M.”
The collection records the person at this event (panellist, closing panel discussion on high-performance teaching (Day 3)).
The person is named in it: “Panelists Iram Qazi, Amina Kamran, Dr. Tarunjit Butalia, and Faiza Shahzad engaged in a dynamic exchange, painting a vivid picture of what world-class, high-performance teaching truly looks like in pract…”
The person is named in it: “Following breakfast, the formal proceedings began in the Auditorium with an introduction by the Headmistress Senior School, Madam Amina Kamran, who outlined the context and objectives of the programme.”