The page “Driverless Cars, Drones, and Discovery: Prep School's Odyssey through China” mentions the person: “The touring delegation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Driverless Cars, Drones, and Discovery: Prep School's Odyssey through China” mentions the person: “The touring delegation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Driverless Cars, Drones, and Discovery: Prep School's Odyssey through China” mentions the person: “The touring delegation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Driverless Cars, Drones, and Discovery: Prep School's Odyssey through China” mentions the person: “The touring delegation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Driverless Cars, Drones, and Discovery: Prep School's Odyssey through China” mentions the person: “The touring delegation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Driverless Cars, Drones, and Discovery: Prep School's Odyssey through China” mentions the person: “The touring delegation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Driverless Cars, Drones, and Discovery: Prep School's Odyssey through China” mentions the person: “The touring delegation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Driverless Cars, Drones, and Discovery: Prep School's Odyssey through China” mentions the person: “The touring delegation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Driverless Cars, Drones, and Discovery: Prep School's Odyssey through China” mentions the person: “The touring delegation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Driverless Cars, Drones, and Discovery: Prep School's Odyssey through China” mentions the person: “The touring delegation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 71.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 75.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 65.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 67.0, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 57.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 62.7, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 66.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 61.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 71.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Appearances in films are recorded with their time ranges once faces in scenes have been matched or named.
Driverless Cars, Drones, and Discovery: Prep School's Odyssey through China The Prep School organised an educational-cum-recreational international tour to China from 8–16 June 2026. The touring delegation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese …
It stands as a defining moment for Aitchison and a landmark for student rocketry in Pakistan. It stands as proof of what students can achieve when they are given the freedom to build, test, fail, improve and try again. Driverless Cars, Drones, and Discovery: Prep School's Odyssey through China The P…
Stated facts, such as a role held or an award won, are listed here with the quote and revision that support each one.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 59.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 70.0, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 67.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 75.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 71.7, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 57.0, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 59.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 69.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 63.5, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 62.9, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 69.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 74.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 64.7, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 61.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 58.0, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 60.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 62.5, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 56.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 59.9, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 75.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 62.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 56.0, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 73.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 62.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 66.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 67.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 68.5, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 69.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 62.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 69.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 55.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 65.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 63.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 65.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 57.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 70.9, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 62.0, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 65.0, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 62.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 65.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 64.9, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 69.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 63.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 61.9, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 71.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 58.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 62.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 62.5, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 62.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 69.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “Preppy 25”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
The page “activity glimpses 3” mentions the person: “The touring delegation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “activity glimpses 3” mentions the person: “The touring delegation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “activity glimpses 3” mentions the person: “The touring delegation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “activity glimpses 3” mentions the person: “The touring delegation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “activity glimpses 3” mentions the person: “The touring delegation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “activity glimpses 3” mentions the person: “The touring delegation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “activity glimpses 3” mentions the person: “The touring delegation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “activity glimpses 3” mentions the person: “The touring delegation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “activity glimpses 3” mentions the person: “The touring delegation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “activity glimpses 3” mentions the person: “The touring delegation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “activity glimpses 3” mentions the person: “The touring delegation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “activity glimpses 3” mentions the person: “The touring delegation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
Poetica Editorial Board Group Photograph (Academic Session 2024-2025) L to R (Sitting) : Daud Arshad, Aahil Saleem Nasir, Mr. Faizan Haider (Staff Advisor), Dr. Syed Muhammad Turab Hussain (Principal), Raja Ashfaq Ahmad (Headmaster), Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil (Deputy Headmaster), Syed M. Aaliyan Zai…
102 Editorial Board French Academic Session (2024-25) L to R (Sitting): Syed Irtaza Haroon, Mahad Mir, Mr. Moeed Khalid (Staff Advisor), Raja Ashfaq Ahmad (Headmaster), Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil (Deputy Headmaster), Ibadullah Khan, Ghazan Waheed Khan