The collection holds 52 photographs, 6 pages or documents and 1 event connected to this person. Dated 2023 to 2026 (46 items); 13 with no date. This is what has been collected and read so far, not every photograph ever taken.
52 items match; showing 1–52.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 56.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 56.3 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 56.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 56.1 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 63.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 63.6 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 57.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 57.2 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 57.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 57.2 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 58.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 58.2 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 55.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 55.1 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 55.7, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 55.7 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 63.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 63.1 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 60.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 60.3 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 59.9, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 59.9 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 64.0, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 64 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 60.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 60.6 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 71.7, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 71.7 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 69.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 69.2 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 59.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 59.4 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 66.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 66.6 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 65.9, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 65.9 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 61.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 61.4 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 58.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 58.1 (a score, not a probability).
The page “Policy on Disruptive Social Behaviour”, page 1 mentions the person: “…r Ata, Tina Hameed, Khadijah Salman Ghani, Zain Khan, Anam Amama, Bushra Munir, Farzana Mirza, Nusrut Akbar, Syeda Raffia Ali, Muhammad Arshad, Altaf Qadri, Ahmed Ozaif, Muhammad Rauf, Afzaal Tarrar & Moniza Hamid.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
A caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”, page 7 names the person: “Standing Left to Right: Waleed Hassan (Assistant HM Monnoo), Ahsan Mahmood (Assistant HM Saigol), Malik Saeed Baghoor (Assistant HM Monnoo), Muhammad Jawad Dastagir (Assistant HM Monnoo) Sitting Left to Right: Sarmad Khan (Assistant HM Saig”
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 58.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 58.4 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 59.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 59.4 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 56.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 56.2 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 56.9, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 56.9 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 56.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 56.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 60.5, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 60.5 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 61.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 61.1 (a score, not a probability).
The page “Driverless Cars, Drones, and Discovery: Prep School's Odyssey through China” mentions the person: “…legation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Driverless Cars, Drones, and Discovery: Prep School's Odyssey through China” mentions the person: “…legation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Driverless Cars, Drones, and Discovery: Prep School's Odyssey through China” mentions the person: “…legation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Driverless Cars, Drones, and Discovery: Prep School's Odyssey through China” mentions the person: “…legation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Driverless Cars, Drones, and Discovery: Prep School's Odyssey through China” mentions the person: “…legation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Driverless Cars, Drones, and Discovery: Prep School's Odyssey through China” mentions the person: “…legation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Driverless Cars, Drones, and Discovery: Prep School's Odyssey through China” mentions the person: “…legation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Driverless Cars, Drones, and Discovery: Prep School's Odyssey through China” mentions the person: “…legation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Driverless Cars, Drones, and Discovery: Prep School's Odyssey through China” mentions the person: “…legation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Driverless Cars, Drones, and Discovery: Prep School's Odyssey through China” mentions the person: “…legation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Policy on Disruptive Social Behaviours”, page 1 mentions the person: “…Zubair Ata, Tina Hameed, Khadijah Salman, Zain Khan, Anam Amama, Bushra Munir, Farzana Mirza, Nusrut Akbar, Syeda Raffia Ali, Muhammad Arshad, Altaf Qadri, Ahmed Ozaif, Muhammad Rauf, Afzaal Tarrar & Moniza Hamid.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “activity glimpses 3” mentions the person: “…legation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “activity glimpses 3” mentions the person: “…legation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “activity glimpses 3” mentions the person: “…legation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “activity glimpses 3” mentions the person: “…legation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “activity glimpses 3” mentions the person: “…legation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “activity glimpses 3” mentions the person: “…legation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “activity glimpses 3” mentions the person: “…legation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “activity glimpses 3” mentions the person: “…legation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “activity glimpses 3” mentions the person: “…legation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “activity glimpses 3” mentions the person: “…legation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “activity glimpses 3” mentions the person: “…legation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “activity glimpses 3” mentions the person: “…legation comprised thirty-one E2 and M1 students, led and supervised by Ms. Sarah Liu, Head of Chinese Language, PS, Mr. Muhammad Tariq Jamil, Deputy Headmaster, PS, and Mr. Muhammad Rauf, Controller of Examinations, PS.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.