The collection holds 132 photographs, 13 pages or documents and 6 events connected to this person. Dated 2017 to 2026 (144 items); 7 with no date. This is what has been collected and read so far, not every photograph ever taken.
151 items match; showing 1–60.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 66.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 66.8 (a score, not a probability).
The person is named in it: “They boys were accompanied by College staff including Muhammad Tariq, Mr. Zubair Atta, Mr. Khalid Saifullah, Mr. Yaqoob and Mr. Mubashir.”
The collection records the person at this event (accompanying staff).
The page “Boarders Enjoy Trip to Oasis” mentions the person: “They boys were accompanied by College staff including Muhammad Tariq, Mr. Zubair Atta, Mr. Khalid Saifullah, Mr. Yaqoob and Mr. Mubashir.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Boarders Enjoy Trip to Oasis” mentions the person: “They boys were accompanied by College staff including Muhammad Tariq, Mr. Zubair Atta, Mr. Khalid Saifullah, Mr. Yaqoob and Mr. Mubashir.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Boarders Enjoy Trip to Oasis” mentions the person: “They boys were accompanied by College staff including Muhammad Tariq, Mr. Zubair Atta, Mr. Khalid Saifullah, Mr. Yaqoob and Mr. Mubashir.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Boarders Enjoy Trip to Oasis” mentions the person: “They boys were accompanied by College staff including Muhammad Tariq, Mr. Zubair Atta, Mr. Khalid Saifullah, Mr. Yaqoob and Mr. Mubashir.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Boarders Enjoy Trip to Oasis” mentions the person: “They boys were accompanied by College staff including Muhammad Tariq, Mr. Zubair Atta, Mr. Khalid Saifullah, Mr. Yaqoob and Mr. Mubashir.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 78.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 78.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 72.9, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 72.9 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 64.5, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 64.5 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 75.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 75.3 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 75.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 75.2 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 57.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 57.3 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 73.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 73.1 (a score, not a probability).
The person is named in it: “…yyan Ijaz - pursuing Computer Sciences at UMT. - Barrister Muhammad Ahmad Pansota - Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan - Imran Mukhtar Chaudhry – Runs his own company. - Muhammad Tariq – A senior English teacher at the Senior School, Aitchison College. - Ahmed Hassan - Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan. - Ms. Huda Imtiaz - A Teaching Fellow at LUMS. -…”
The collection records the person at this event (judge).
The person is named in it: “Our students undertook the event under the able superintendance of Mr. Iqbal Haider the Head of co-curriculars and Mr. Muhammad Tariq, English Department.”
The collection records the person at this event (superintending staff (English Department)).
The person is named in it: “Senior Boarders Visit Civil Services Academy On Thursday, November 14th , 2024 boarders of the Senior School under the guidance of Mr Muhammad Tariq, Housemaster L J and Mr. Khalid Saifullah, Housemaster Kelly visited the Civil Services Academy, Lahore.”
The collection records the person at this event (accompanying housemaster).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 59.0, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 59 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 55.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 55.4 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 74.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 74.4 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 73.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 73.1 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 57.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 57.2 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 74.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 74.2 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 67.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 67.4 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 78.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 78.6 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 75.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 75.1 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 73.7, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 73.7 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 70.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 70.4 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 58.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 58.2 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 71.7, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 71.7 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 81.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 81.1 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 59.5, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 59.5 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 78.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 78.2 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 55.9, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 55.9 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 59.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 59.2 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 58.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 58.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 63.9, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 63.9 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 62.5, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 62.5 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 65.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 65.1 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 64.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 64.6 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 76.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 76.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 72.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 72.1 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 67.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 67.4 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 74.0, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 74 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 75.9, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 75.9 (a score, not a probability).
The page “In the Love of Literature” mentions the person: “…yyan Ijaz - pursuing Computer Sciences at UMT. - Barrister Muhammad Ahmad Pansota - Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan - Imran Mukhtar Chaudhry – Runs his own company. - Muhammad Tariq – A senior English teacher at the Senior School, Aitchison College. - Ahmed Hassan - Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan. - Ms. Huda Imtiaz - A Teaching Fellow at LUMS. -…” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “In the Love of Literature” mentions the person: “…yyan Ijaz - pursuing Computer Sciences at UMT. - Barrister Muhammad Ahmad Pansota - Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan - Imran Mukhtar Chaudhry – Runs his own company. - Muhammad Tariq – A senior English teacher at the Senior School, Aitchison College. - Ahmed Hassan - Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan. - Ms. Huda Imtiaz - A Teaching Fellow at LUMS. -…” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “In the Love of Literature” mentions the person: “…yyan Ijaz - pursuing Computer Sciences at UMT. - Barrister Muhammad Ahmad Pansota - Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan - Imran Mukhtar Chaudhry – Runs his own company. - Muhammad Tariq – A senior English teacher at the Senior School, Aitchison College. - Ahmed Hassan - Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan. - Ms. Huda Imtiaz - A Teaching Fellow at LUMS. -…” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “In the Love of Literature” mentions the person: “…yyan Ijaz - pursuing Computer Sciences at UMT. - Barrister Muhammad Ahmad Pansota - Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan - Imran Mukhtar Chaudhry – Runs his own company. - Muhammad Tariq – A senior English teacher at the Senior School, Aitchison College. - Ahmed Hassan - Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan. - Ms. Huda Imtiaz - A Teaching Fellow at LUMS. -…” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “In the Love of Literature” mentions the person: “…yyan Ijaz - pursuing Computer Sciences at UMT. - Barrister Muhammad Ahmad Pansota - Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan - Imran Mukhtar Chaudhry – Runs his own company. - Muhammad Tariq – A senior English teacher at the Senior School, Aitchison College. - Ahmed Hassan - Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan. - Ms. Huda Imtiaz - A Teaching Fellow at LUMS. -…” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “In the Love of Literature” mentions the person: “…yyan Ijaz - pursuing Computer Sciences at UMT. - Barrister Muhammad Ahmad Pansota - Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan - Imran Mukhtar Chaudhry – Runs his own company. - Muhammad Tariq – A senior English teacher at the Senior School, Aitchison College. - Ahmed Hassan - Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan. - Ms. Huda Imtiaz - A Teaching Fellow at LUMS. -…” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “In the Love of Literature” mentions the person: “…yyan Ijaz - pursuing Computer Sciences at UMT. - Barrister Muhammad Ahmad Pansota - Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan - Imran Mukhtar Chaudhry – Runs his own company. - Muhammad Tariq – A senior English teacher at the Senior School, Aitchison College. - Ahmed Hassan - Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan. - Ms. Huda Imtiaz - A Teaching Fellow at LUMS. -…” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “In the Love of Literature” mentions the person: “…yyan Ijaz - pursuing Computer Sciences at UMT. - Barrister Muhammad Ahmad Pansota - Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan - Imran Mukhtar Chaudhry – Runs his own company. - Muhammad Tariq – A senior English teacher at the Senior School, Aitchison College. - Ahmed Hassan - Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan. - Ms. Huda Imtiaz - A Teaching Fellow at LUMS. -…” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “In the Love of Literature” mentions the person: “…yyan Ijaz - pursuing Computer Sciences at UMT. - Barrister Muhammad Ahmad Pansota - Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan - Imran Mukhtar Chaudhry – Runs his own company. - Muhammad Tariq – A senior English teacher at the Senior School, Aitchison College. - Ahmed Hassan - Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan. - Ms. Huda Imtiaz - A Teaching Fellow at LUMS. -…” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “In the Love of Literature” mentions the person: “…yyan Ijaz - pursuing Computer Sciences at UMT. - Barrister Muhammad Ahmad Pansota - Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan - Imran Mukhtar Chaudhry – Runs his own company. - Muhammad Tariq – A senior English teacher at the Senior School, Aitchison College. - Ahmed Hassan - Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan. - Ms. Huda Imtiaz - A Teaching Fellow at LUMS. -…” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “In the Love of Literature” mentions the person: “…yyan Ijaz - pursuing Computer Sciences at UMT. - Barrister Muhammad Ahmad Pansota - Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan - Imran Mukhtar Chaudhry – Runs his own company. - Muhammad Tariq – A senior English teacher at the Senior School, Aitchison College. - Ahmed Hassan - Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan. - Ms. Huda Imtiaz - A Teaching Fellow at LUMS. -…” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.