The collection holds 273 photographs, 16 pages or documents and 7 events connected to this person. Dated 2016 to 2026 (276 items); 20 with no date. This is what has been collected and read so far, not every photograph ever taken.
296 items match; showing 181–240.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 67.7, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 67.7 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 71.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 71.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 75.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 75.2 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 72.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 72.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 70.9, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 70.9 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 57.0, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 57 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 73.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 73.1 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 56.9, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 56.9 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 65.7, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 65.7 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 72.7, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 72.7 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 66.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 66.3 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 67.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 67.3 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 68.5, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 68.5 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 78.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 78.2 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 75.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 75.3 (a score, not a probability).
The page “Aitchison College Staff Stuns ACOBA Eleven” mentions the person: “…rge | 02 Wickets Ammar Azam | 21 runs | Ghulam Abbas | 01 Wicket Muhammad Ahmad | 22 runs | Rashid Maqbool | 01 Wicket Sharjeel Niazi | 21* runs | Amin Ather | 01 Wicket Iqbal Haider | 01 Wicket Waqar Saleem | 01 Wicket Result: AC Staff won by 53 runs Man of Series: Mr. Umer Zaman Khan Aitchison College Staff Won The Three Match Series 2-1” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Aitchison College Staff Stuns ACOBA Eleven” mentions the person: “…rge | 02 Wickets Ammar Azam | 21 runs | Ghulam Abbas | 01 Wicket Muhammad Ahmad | 22 runs | Rashid Maqbool | 01 Wicket Sharjeel Niazi | 21* runs | Amin Ather | 01 Wicket Iqbal Haider | 01 Wicket Waqar Saleem | 01 Wicket Result: AC Staff won by 53 runs Man of Series: Mr. Umer Zaman Khan Aitchison College Staff Won The Three Match Series 2-1” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Aitchison College Staff Stuns ACOBA Eleven” mentions the person: “…rge | 02 Wickets Ammar Azam | 21 runs | Ghulam Abbas | 01 Wicket Muhammad Ahmad | 22 runs | Rashid Maqbool | 01 Wicket Sharjeel Niazi | 21* runs | Amin Ather | 01 Wicket Iqbal Haider | 01 Wicket Waqar Saleem | 01 Wicket Result: AC Staff won by 53 runs Man of Series: Mr. Umer Zaman Khan Aitchison College Staff Won The Three Match Series 2-1” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Aitchison College Staff Stuns ACOBA Eleven” mentions the person: “…rge | 02 Wickets Ammar Azam | 21 runs | Ghulam Abbas | 01 Wicket Muhammad Ahmad | 22 runs | Rashid Maqbool | 01 Wicket Sharjeel Niazi | 21* runs | Amin Ather | 01 Wicket Iqbal Haider | 01 Wicket Waqar Saleem | 01 Wicket Result: AC Staff won by 53 runs Man of Series: Mr. Umer Zaman Khan Aitchison College Staff Won The Three Match Series 2-1” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Aitchison College Staff Stuns ACOBA Eleven” mentions the person: “…rge | 02 Wickets Ammar Azam | 21 runs | Ghulam Abbas | 01 Wicket Muhammad Ahmad | 22 runs | Rashid Maqbool | 01 Wicket Sharjeel Niazi | 21* runs | Amin Ather | 01 Wicket Iqbal Haider | 01 Wicket Waqar Saleem | 01 Wicket Result: AC Staff won by 53 runs Man of Series: Mr. Umer Zaman Khan Aitchison College Staff Won The Three Match Series 2-1” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Aitchison College Staff Stuns ACOBA Eleven” mentions the person: “…rge | 02 Wickets Ammar Azam | 21 runs | Ghulam Abbas | 01 Wicket Muhammad Ahmad | 22 runs | Rashid Maqbool | 01 Wicket Sharjeel Niazi | 21* runs | Amin Ather | 01 Wicket Iqbal Haider | 01 Wicket Waqar Saleem | 01 Wicket Result: AC Staff won by 53 runs Man of Series: Mr. Umer Zaman Khan Aitchison College Staff Won The Three Match Series 2-1” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Aitchison College Staff Stuns ACOBA Eleven” mentions the person: “…rge | 02 Wickets Ammar Azam | 21 runs | Ghulam Abbas | 01 Wicket Muhammad Ahmad | 22 runs | Rashid Maqbool | 01 Wicket Sharjeel Niazi | 21* runs | Amin Ather | 01 Wicket Iqbal Haider | 01 Wicket Waqar Saleem | 01 Wicket Result: AC Staff won by 53 runs Man of Series: Mr. Umer Zaman Khan Aitchison College Staff Won The Three Match Series 2-1” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Aitchison College Staff Stuns ACOBA Eleven” mentions the person: “…rge | 02 Wickets Ammar Azam | 21 runs | Ghulam Abbas | 01 Wicket Muhammad Ahmad | 22 runs | Rashid Maqbool | 01 Wicket Sharjeel Niazi | 21* runs | Amin Ather | 01 Wicket Iqbal Haider | 01 Wicket Waqar Saleem | 01 Wicket Result: AC Staff won by 53 runs Man of Series: Mr. Umer Zaman Khan Aitchison College Staff Won The Three Match Series 2-1” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Aitchison College Staff Stuns ACOBA Eleven” mentions the person: “…rge | 02 Wickets Ammar Azam | 21 runs | Ghulam Abbas | 01 Wicket Muhammad Ahmad | 22 runs | Rashid Maqbool | 01 Wicket Sharjeel Niazi | 21* runs | Amin Ather | 01 Wicket Iqbal Haider | 01 Wicket Waqar Saleem | 01 Wicket Result: AC Staff won by 53 runs Man of Series: Mr. Umer Zaman Khan Aitchison College Staff Won The Three Match Series 2-1” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Aitchison College Staff Stuns ACOBA Eleven” mentions the person: “…rge | 02 Wickets Ammar Azam | 21 runs | Ghulam Abbas | 01 Wicket Muhammad Ahmad | 22 runs | Rashid Maqbool | 01 Wicket Sharjeel Niazi | 21* runs | Amin Ather | 01 Wicket Iqbal Haider | 01 Wicket Waqar Saleem | 01 Wicket Result: AC Staff won by 53 runs Man of Series: Mr. Umer Zaman Khan Aitchison College Staff Won The Three Match Series 2-1” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Aitchison College Staff Stuns ACOBA Eleven” mentions the person: “…rge | 02 Wickets Ammar Azam | 21 runs | Ghulam Abbas | 01 Wicket Muhammad Ahmad | 22 runs | Rashid Maqbool | 01 Wicket Sharjeel Niazi | 21* runs | Amin Ather | 01 Wicket Iqbal Haider | 01 Wicket Waqar Saleem | 01 Wicket Result: AC Staff won by 53 runs Man of Series: Mr. Umer Zaman Khan Aitchison College Staff Won The Three Match Series 2-1” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Aitchison College Staff Stuns ACOBA Eleven” mentions the person: “…rge | 02 Wickets Ammar Azam | 21 runs | Ghulam Abbas | 01 Wicket Muhammad Ahmad | 22 runs | Rashid Maqbool | 01 Wicket Sharjeel Niazi | 21* runs | Amin Ather | 01 Wicket Iqbal Haider | 01 Wicket Waqar Saleem | 01 Wicket Result: AC Staff won by 53 runs Man of Series: Mr. Umer Zaman Khan Aitchison College Staff Won The Three Match Series 2-1” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
A caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”, page 8 names the person: “Standing Left to Right: Umair Gulzar (Assistant HM K&N), Jamal Malhi (Assistant HM Kelly), Muhammad Yaqoob (Assistant HM LJ), Muhammad Ali (Assistant HM Godley), Saleem Akhtar (Assistant HM Shirazi) Sitting Left to Right: Syed Shahmeer Raza”
The person is named in it: “…ly House kelly@aitchison.edu.pk 228 Zubair Ata Housemaster Godley House godley@aitchison.edu.pk 327 Muhammad Tariq Housemaster Leslie Jones House lj@aitchison.edu.pk 294 Iqbal Haider Housemaster Shirazi House shirazi@aitchison.edu.pk 313 Syed Shahmeer Raza Housemaster K&N’s House kn's@aitchison.edu.pk 433 Dr. Aftab Ahmed Malik Senior Resident Medical…”
The person is named in it: “…y House), Muhammad Tariq (Housemaster Leslie Jones), Dr. S.M Turab Hussain (Principal), Amina Kamran (Headmistress Senior School), Zubair Ata (Housemaster Godley House), Iqbal Haider (Housemaster Shirazi House) 8”
The person is named in it: “The delegation was accompanied by Mr. Iqbal Haider.”
The collection records the person at this event (accompanying staff member).
The person is named in it: “They were accompanied by Mr. Khalid Saifullah, Mr. Iqbal Haider, Mr. Muhammad Tariq, and Mr. Waqas Younas, who served as supervising faculty and camp counsellors.”
The collection records the person at this event (supervising faculty and camp counsellor).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 59.7, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 59.7 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 70.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 70.6 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 67.0, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 67 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 71.7, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 71.7 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 67.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 67.3 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 68.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 68.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 69.7, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 69.7 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 61.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 61.4 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 56.7, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 56.7 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 68.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 68.6 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 60.9, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 60.9 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 70.5, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 70.5 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 70.5, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 70.5 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 65.5, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 65.5 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 70.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 70.2 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 64.7, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 64.7 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 67.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 67.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 64.5, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 64.5 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 70.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 70.6 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 58.0, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 58 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 69.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 69.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 67.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 67.4 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 70.7, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 70.7 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 67.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 67.6 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 64.7, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 64.7 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 56.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 56.2 (a score, not a probability).