The collection holds 89 photographs, 10 pages or documents and 4 events connected to this person. Dated 2017 to 2026 (101 items); 2 with no date. This is what has been collected and read so far, not every photograph ever taken.
103 items match; showing 61–103.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 59.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 59.3 (a score, not a probability).
The collection records the person at this event (Housemaster (speech)).
The person is named in it: “In his speech, the Housemaster, Mr. Zubair Ata, highlighted the outstanding achievements of the House and the boys in academics, sports, and co-curricular activities.”
The person is named in it: “Aitchison College, Lahore Policy on Disruptive Social Behaviours Compiled by: Working Group Working Group Composition: Zubair Ata, Tina Hameed, Khadijah Salman Ghani, Zain Khan, Anam Amama, Bushra Munir, Farzana Mirza, Nusrut Akbar, Syeda Raffia Ali, Muhammad Arshad, Altaf Qadri, Ahmed Ozaif, Muham…”
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 59.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 59.4 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 68.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 68.3 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 64.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 64.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 62.0, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 62 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 60.5, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 60.5 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 63.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 63.3 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 59.9, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 59.9 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 64.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 64.2 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 63.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 63.3 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 64.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 64.2 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 70.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 70.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 60.0, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 60 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 71.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 71.3 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 71.9, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 71.9 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 71.7, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 71.7 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 66.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 66.6 (a score, not a probability).
The page “Godley House, Annual Dinner, 25” mentions the person: “In his speech, the Housemaster, Mr. Zubair Ata, highlighted the outstanding achievements of the House and the boys in academics, sports, and co-curricular activities.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Godley House, Annual Dinner, 25” mentions the person: “In his speech, the Housemaster, Mr. Zubair Ata, highlighted the outstanding achievements of the House and the boys in academics, sports, and co-curricular activities.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Godley House, Annual Dinner, 25” mentions the person: “In his speech, the Housemaster, Mr. Zubair Ata, highlighted the outstanding achievements of the House and the boys in academics, sports, and co-curricular activities.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Godley House, Annual Dinner, 25” mentions the person: “In his speech, the Housemaster, Mr. Zubair Ata, highlighted the outstanding achievements of the House and the boys in academics, sports, and co-curricular activities.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Godley House, Annual Dinner, 25” mentions the person: “In his speech, the Housemaster, Mr. Zubair Ata, highlighted the outstanding achievements of the House and the boys in academics, sports, and co-curricular activities.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Godley House, Annual Dinner, 25” mentions the person: “In his speech, the Housemaster, Mr. Zubair Ata, highlighted the outstanding achievements of the House and the boys in academics, sports, and co-curricular activities.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Godley House, Annual Dinner, 25” mentions the person: “In his speech, the Housemaster, Mr. Zubair Ata, highlighted the outstanding achievements of the House and the boys in academics, sports, and co-curricular activities.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Godley House, Annual Dinner, 25” mentions the person: “In his speech, the Housemaster, Mr. Zubair Ata, highlighted the outstanding achievements of the House and the boys in academics, sports, and co-curricular activities.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Policy on Disruptive Social Behaviour”, page 1 mentions the person: “Aitchison College, Lahore Policy on Disruptive Social Behaviours Compiled by: Working Group Working Group Composition: Zubair Ata, Tina Hameed, Khadijah Salman Ghani, Zain Khan, Anam Amama, Bushra Munir, Farzana Mirza, Nusrut Akbar, Syeda Raffia Ali, Muhammad Arshad, Altaf Qadri, Ahmed Ozaif, Muham…” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
A caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”, page 8 names the person: “Standing Left to Right: Umair Gulzar (Assistant HM K&N), Jamal Malhi (Assistant HM Kelly), Muhammad Yaqoob (Assistant HM LJ), Muhammad Ali (Assistant HM Godley), Saleem Akhtar (Assistant HM Shirazi) Sitting Left to Right: Syed Shahmeer Raza”
The person is named in it: “…House saigol@aitchison.edu.pk 243 Muhammad Rauf Housemaster Monnoo House monnoo@aitchison.edu.pk 304 Khalid Saifullah Housemaster Kelly House kelly@aitchison.edu.pk 228 Zubair Ata Housemaster Godley House godley@aitchison.edu.pk 327 Muhammad Tariq Housemaster Leslie Jones House lj@aitchison.edu.pk 294 Iqbal Haider Housemaster Shirazi House shirazi…”
The person is named in it: “…&N), Khalid Saifullah (Housemaster Kelly House), Muhammad Tariq (Housemaster Leslie Jones), Dr. S.M Turab Hussain (Principal), Amina Kamran (Headmistress Senior School), Zubair Ata (Housemaster Godley House), Iqbal Haider (Housemaster Shirazi House) 8”
The person is named in it: “Aitchison College, Lahore Policy on Disruptive Social Behaviours Compiled by: Working Group Working Group Composition: Zubair Ata, Tina Hameed, Khadijah Salman, Zain Khan, Anam Amama, Bushra Munir, Farzana Mirza, Nusrut Akbar, Syeda Raffia Ali, Muhammad Arshad, Altaf Qadri, Ahmed Ozaif, Muhammad Ra…”
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 63.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 63.4 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 66.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 66.2 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 61.7, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 61.7 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 67.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 67.6 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 64.5, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 64.5 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 59.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 59.1 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 66.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 66.2 (a score, not a probability).
The page “Policy on Disruptive Social Behaviours”, page 1 mentions the person: “Aitchison College, Lahore Policy on Disruptive Social Behaviours Compiled by: Working Group Working Group Composition: Zubair Ata, Tina Hameed, Khadijah Salman, Zain Khan, Anam Amama, Bushra Munir, Farzana Mirza, Nusrut Akbar, Syeda Raffia Ali, Muhammad Arshad, Altaf Qadri, Ahmed Ozaif, Muhammad Ra…” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The person is named in it: “In his speech, the Housemaster, Mr. Zubair Ata, highlighted the outstanding achievements of the House and the boys in academics, sports, and co-curricular activities.”
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 60.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 60.1 (a score, not a probability).