The collection holds 89 photographs, 10 pages or documents and 4 events connected to this person. Dated 2017 to 2026 (101 items); 2 with no date. This is what has been collected and read so far, not every photograph ever taken.
103 items match; showing 1–60.
The person is named in it: “Mr. Zubair Ata (Aitchisonian) will be housemaster.”
The collection records the person at this event (participant).
The person is named in it: “Mr. Shahid Mehmood Aslam (Senior Director Games and Sports) Mr. Zubair Ata (Incharge Welfare Discipline Senior School and Housemaster Bahawalpur House), Mr. Asad Ur Rehman (Old Aitchisonian and Jubilee Medal holder), Mr. Hamid Hussain (owner of…”
The page “Newsletter (Senior) — April 2018”, page 4 (April 2018) mentions the person: “Mr. Shahid Mehmood Aslam (Senior Director Games and Sports) Mr. Zubair Ata (Incharge Welfare Discipline Senior School and Housemaster Bahawalpur House), Mr. Asad Ur Rehman (Old Aitchisonian and Jubilee Medal holder), Mr. Hamid Hussain (owner of…” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Newsletter (Senior) — April 2018”, page 4 (April 2018) mentions the person: “Mr. Shahid Mehmood Aslam (Senior Director Games and Sports) Mr. Zubair Ata (Incharge Welfare Discipline Senior School and Housemaster Bahawalpur House), Mr. Asad Ur Rehman (Old Aitchisonian and Jubilee Medal holder), Mr. Hamid Hussain (owner of…” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Newsletter (Senior) — April 2018”, page 4 (April 2018) mentions the person: “Mr. Shahid Mehmood Aslam (Senior Director Games and Sports) Mr. Zubair Ata (Incharge Welfare Discipline Senior School and Housemaster Bahawalpur House), Mr. Asad Ur Rehman (Old Aitchisonian and Jubilee Medal holder), Mr. Hamid Hussain (owner of…” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Newsletter (Senior) — April 2018”, page 4 (April 2018) mentions the person: “Mr. Shahid Mehmood Aslam (Senior Director Games and Sports) Mr. Zubair Ata (Incharge Welfare Discipline Senior School and Housemaster Bahawalpur House), Mr. Asad Ur Rehman (Old Aitchisonian and Jubilee Medal holder), Mr. Hamid Hussain (owner of…” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
A caption in “Old Boys' Bulletin — November 2021”, page 1 (November 2021) names the person: “Old Boys as Aitchison College Faculty gathered for a group photo at the Old Building on Thursday June 3rd 2021. Sitting L- R : Ahmed Bilal Qureshi (PS English Teacher), Jamal Hussain (Head of USA Admissions) , Mian Waqar Ahmad (Senior Data ”
The collection records the person at this event (Old Boy on the staff (named in the photograph caption)).
The person is named in it: “…Ahmed Bilal Qureshi (PS English Teacher), Jamal Hussain (Head of USA Admissions) , Mian Waqar Ahmad (Senior Data Analyst Sports), Shahzad Waheed (SDO Works Department) , Zubair Ata (HM Godley) ,Khalid Muhammad Noon (Bursar), Umer Zaman Khan (Director Games & Sports), Bilal Mahmood Khan(SS Economics Teacher), Ahmed Ozaif (Housemaster Saigol House, E…”
The person is named in it: “The distinguished old boys stressed the need to learn to work as part of a cohesive unit and develop strong moral character. 2nd Day Mr. Zubair Ata, House-Master Godley and Head of Discipline, spoke on what it means to be a gentleman and emphasised the need to build strong personal values, effective communication, a…”
The collection records the person at this event (speaker).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 70.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 70.1 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 75.0, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 75 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 61.9, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 61.9 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 67.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 67.4 (a score, not a probability).
The page “Leadership Camp for Prefects and Sports Captains 2022” mentions the person: “The distinguished old boys stressed the need to learn to work as part of a cohesive unit and develop strong moral character. 2nd Day Mr. Zubair Ata, House-Master Godley and Head of Discipline, spoke on what it means to be a gentleman and emphasised the need to build strong personal values, effective communication, a…” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Leadership Camp for Prefects and Sports Captains 2022” mentions the person: “The distinguished old boys stressed the need to learn to work as part of a cohesive unit and develop strong moral character. 2nd Day Mr. Zubair Ata, House-Master Godley and Head of Discipline, spoke on what it means to be a gentleman and emphasised the need to build strong personal values, effective communication, a…” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Leadership Camp for Prefects and Sports Captains 2022” mentions the person: “The distinguished old boys stressed the need to learn to work as part of a cohesive unit and develop strong moral character. 2nd Day Mr. Zubair Ata, House-Master Godley and Head of Discipline, spoke on what it means to be a gentleman and emphasised the need to build strong personal values, effective communication, a…” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Leadership Camp for Prefects and Sports Captains 2022” mentions the person: “The distinguished old boys stressed the need to learn to work as part of a cohesive unit and develop strong moral character. 2nd Day Mr. Zubair Ata, House-Master Godley and Head of Discipline, spoke on what it means to be a gentleman and emphasised the need to build strong personal values, effective communication, a…” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Leadership Camp for Prefects and Sports Captains 2022” mentions the person: “The distinguished old boys stressed the need to learn to work as part of a cohesive unit and develop strong moral character. 2nd Day Mr. Zubair Ata, House-Master Godley and Head of Discipline, spoke on what it means to be a gentleman and emphasised the need to build strong personal values, effective communication, a…” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Leadership Camp for Prefects and Sports Captains 2022” mentions the person: “The distinguished old boys stressed the need to learn to work as part of a cohesive unit and develop strong moral character. 2nd Day Mr. Zubair Ata, House-Master Godley and Head of Discipline, spoke on what it means to be a gentleman and emphasised the need to build strong personal values, effective communication, a…” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Leadership Camp for Prefects and Sports Captains 2022” mentions the person: “The distinguished old boys stressed the need to learn to work as part of a cohesive unit and develop strong moral character. 2nd Day Mr. Zubair Ata, House-Master Godley and Head of Discipline, spoke on what it means to be a gentleman and emphasised the need to build strong personal values, effective communication, a…” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Leadership Camp for Prefects and Sports Captains 2022” mentions the person: “The distinguished old boys stressed the need to learn to work as part of a cohesive unit and develop strong moral character. 2nd Day Mr. Zubair Ata, House-Master Godley and Head of Discipline, spoke on what it means to be a gentleman and emphasised the need to build strong personal values, effective communication, a…” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 71.5, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 71.5 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 63.9, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 63.9 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 61.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 61.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 58.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 58.3 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 55.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 55.3 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 63.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 63.3 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 72.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 72.6 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 66.9, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 66.9 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 56.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 56.6 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 62.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 62.3 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 69.7, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 69.7 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 57.5, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 57.5 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 60.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 60.6 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 66.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 66.6 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 67.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 67.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 67.9, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 67.9 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 65.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 65.4 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 58.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 58.1 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 62.5, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 62.5 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 71.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 71.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 65.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 65.2 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 68.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 68.1 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 70.0, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 70 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 69.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 69.1 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 63.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 63.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 69.5, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 69.5 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 65.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 65.2 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 65.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 65.2 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 65.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 65.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 63.9, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 63.9 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 67.5, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 67.5 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 66.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 66.6 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 69.0, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 69 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 68.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 68.4 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 62.5, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 62.5 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 63.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 63.4 (a score, not a probability).