at the College 1991–2000
The collection holds 59 photographs, 6 pages or documents and 1 event connected to this person. Dated 2019 to 2026 (66 items). This is what has been collected and read so far, not every photograph ever taken.
18 items match; showing 1–18.
A caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”, page 7 names the person: “Standing Left to Right: Waleed Hassan (Assistant HM Monnoo), Ahsan Mahmood (Assistant HM Saigol), Malik Saeed Baghoor (Assistant HM Monnoo), Muhammad Jawad Dastagir (Assistant HM Monnoo) Sitting Left to Right: Sarmad Khan (Assistant HM Saig”
The person is named in it: “…hool hmps@aitchison.edu.pk 335 Fatima Mubeen Headmistress Junior School hmjs@aitchison.edu.pk 215 Rukhsana Khan Senior Housemistress Gwyn House gwyn@aitchison.edu.pk 257 Ahmed Ozaif Housemaster Saigol House saigol@aitchison.edu.pk 243 Muhammad Rauf Housemaster Monnoo House monnoo@aitchison.edu.pk 304 Khalid Saifullah Housemaster Kelly House kelly@ai…”
The person is named in it: “…(Assistant HM Monnoo), Muhammad Jawad Dastagir (Assistant HM Monnoo) Sitting Left to Right: Sarmad Khan (Assistant HM Saigol), Mubashir Hasan Abid (Assistant HM Saigol), Ahmed Ozaif (Housemaster Saigol House), Dr. S. M Turab Hussain (Principal), Raja Ashfaq Ahmed (Headmaster Prep School), Muhammad Rauf (Housemaster Monnoo House), Syed Amar Mahdi (As…”
The person is named in it: “…Composition: Zubair Ata, Tina Hameed, Khadijah Salman, Zain Khan, Anam Amama, Bushra Munir, Farzana Mirza, Nusrut Akbar, Syeda Raffia Ali, Muhammad Arshad, Altaf Qadri, Ahmed Ozaif, Muhammad Rauf, Afzaal Tarrar & Moniza Hamid.”
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 66.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 66.1 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 62.0, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 62 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 68.9, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 68.9 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 58.9, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 58.9 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 64.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 64.6 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 68.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 68.4 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 71.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 71.2 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 69.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 69.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 57.9, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 57.9 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 64.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 64.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 64.7, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 64.7 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 56.0, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 56 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 70.0, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 70 (a score, not a probability).
The page “Policy on Disruptive Social Behaviours”, page 1 mentions the person: “…Composition: Zubair Ata, Tina Hameed, Khadijah Salman, Zain Khan, Anam Amama, Bushra Munir, Farzana Mirza, Nusrut Akbar, Syeda Raffia Ali, Muhammad Arshad, Altaf Qadri, Ahmed Ozaif, Muhammad Rauf, Afzaal Tarrar & Moniza Hamid.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.