The collection holds 273 photographs, 16 pages or documents and 7 events connected to this person. Dated 2016 to 2026 (276 items); 20 with no date. This is what has been collected and read so far, not every photograph ever taken.
296 items match; showing 61–120.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 64.9, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 64.9 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 65.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 65.1 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 55.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 55.3 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 57.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 57.2 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 60.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 60.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 69.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 69.3 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 63.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 63.2 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 59.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 59.3 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 60.9, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 60.9 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 59.7, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 59.7 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 58.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 58.4 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 61.0, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 61 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 57.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 57.4 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 64.0, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 64 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 57.5, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 57.5 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 64.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 64.4 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 56.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 56.3 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 65.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 65.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 63.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 63.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 63.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 63.2 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 66.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 66.6 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 67.5, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 67.5 (a score, not a probability).
The page “Aitchison College Students Shine Globally - Team Pakistan Star Triumphs at CupExS in Georgia” mentions the person: “The team was led by Mr. Iqbal Haider, Head of Co-curriculars and Wasil Bilal Fareed.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Aitchison College Students Shine Globally - Team Pakistan Star Triumphs at CupExS in Georgia” mentions the person: “The team was led by Mr. Iqbal Haider, Head of Co-curriculars and Wasil Bilal Fareed.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Old Boys' Bulletin — December 2024”, page 6 (December 2024) mentions the person: “Aitchison Wins at Batumi’s Cup of Experimental Sciences A Group Photo of Team Aitchison and Sir Iqbal Haider, (Head of Co-curricular) with their Trophy.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Old Boys' Bulletin — December 2024”, page 6 (December 2024) mentions the person: “Aitchison Wins at Batumi’s Cup of Experimental Sciences A Group Photo of Team Aitchison and Sir Iqbal Haider, (Head of Co-curricular) with their Trophy.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “The Senior School Boarders attend Dr. Tarunjit Singh Butalia's Lecture” mentions the person: “Our students undertook the event under the able superintendance of Mr. Iqbal Haider the Head of co-curriculars and Mr. Muhammad Tariq, English Department.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “The Senior School Boarders attend Dr. Tarunjit Singh Butalia's Lecture” mentions the person: “Our students undertook the event under the able superintendance of Mr. Iqbal Haider the Head of co-curriculars and Mr. Muhammad Tariq, English Department.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “The Senior School Boarders attend Dr. Tarunjit Singh Butalia's Lecture” mentions the person: “Our students undertook the event under the able superintendance of Mr. Iqbal Haider the Head of co-curriculars and Mr. Muhammad Tariq, English Department.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “The Senior School Boarders attend Dr. Tarunjit Singh Butalia's Lecture” mentions the person: “Our students undertook the event under the able superintendance of Mr. Iqbal Haider the Head of co-curriculars and Mr. Muhammad Tariq, English Department.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “The Senior School Boarders attend Dr. Tarunjit Singh Butalia's Lecture” mentions the person: “Our students undertook the event under the able superintendance of Mr. Iqbal Haider the Head of co-curriculars and Mr. Muhammad Tariq, English Department.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Old Boys' Bulletin — December 2024”, page 6 (December 2024) mentions the person: “Aitchison Wins at Batumi’s Cup of Experimental Sciences A Group Photo of Team Aitchison and Sir Iqbal Haider, (Head of Co-curricular) with their Trophy.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The person is named in it: “…rge | 02 Wickets Ammar Azam | 21 runs | Ghulam Abbas | 01 Wicket Muhammad Ahmad | 22 runs | Rashid Maqbool | 01 Wicket Sharjeel Niazi | 21* runs | Amin Ather | 01 Wicket Iqbal Haider | 01 Wicket Waqar Saleem | 01 Wicket Result: AC Staff won by 53 runs Man of Series: Mr. Umer Zaman Khan Aitchison College Staff Won The Three Match Series 2-1”
The collection records the person at this event (bowler, result 1 wicket).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 64.9, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 64.9 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 68.7, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 68.7 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 62.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 62.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 73.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 73.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 69.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 69.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 70.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 70.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 67.5, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 67.5 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 64.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 64.6 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 67.7, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 67.7 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 62.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 62.4 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 69.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 69.4 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 76.0, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 76 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 55.5, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 55.5 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 60.9, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 60.9 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 56.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 56.2 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 66.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 66.1 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 68.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 68.3 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 61.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 61.2 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 60.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 60.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 64.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 64.6 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 62.0, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 62 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 66.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 66.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 66.7, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 66.7 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 69.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 69.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 62.9, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 62.9 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 66.7, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 66.7 (a score, not a probability).