at the College 1991–2000
The collection holds 59 photographs, 6 pages or documents and 1 event connected to this person. Dated 2019 to 2026 (66 items). This is what has been collected and read so far, not every photograph ever taken.
59 items match; showing 1–59.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 65.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 65.1 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 66.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 66.2 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 70.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 70.1 (a score, not a probability).
A caption in “Old Boys' Bulletin — November 2021”, page 1 (November 2021) names the person: “Old Boys as Aitchison College Faculty gathered for a group photo at the Old Building on Thursday June 3rd 2021. Sitting L- R : Ahmed Bilal Qureshi (PS English Teacher), Jamal Hussain (Head of USA Admissions) , Mian Waqar Ahmad (Senior Data ”
The page “Spectrum — November 2023”, page 2 (November 2023) mentions the person: “From the extra rounds by Sir Sajid in the night to usher all of my batchmates into beds, the morning runs with Sir Ahmed Ozaif and racing each other on the cross-country route to the long but very touching moral lessons learned in Sir Zubair’s office, all of us were able to find individuals that…” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Spectrum — November 2023”, page 2 (November 2023) mentions the person: “From the extra rounds by Sir Sajid in the night to usher all of my batchmates into beds, the morning runs with Sir Ahmed Ozaif and racing each other on the cross-country route to the long but very touching moral lessons learned in Sir Zubair’s office, all of us were able to find individuals that…” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
The page “Spectrum — November 2023”, page 2 (November 2023) mentions the person: “From the extra rounds by Sir Sajid in the night to usher all of my batchmates into beds, the morning runs with Sir Ahmed Ozaif and racing each other on the cross-country route to the long but very touching moral lessons learned in Sir Zubair’s office, all of us were able to find individuals that…” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 67.5, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 67.5 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 59.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 59.2 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 69.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 69.4 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 64.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 64.6 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 66.0, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 66 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 59.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 59.3 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 70.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 70.3 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 65.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 65.4 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 59.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 59.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 65.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 65.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 65.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 65.3 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 62.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 62.3 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 63.7, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 63.7 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 67.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 67.4 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 64.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 64.4 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 64.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 64.1 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 58.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 58.1 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 64.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 64.6 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 65.9, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 65.9 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 71.5, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 71.5 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 72.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 72.3 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 60.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 60.1 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 61.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 61.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 59.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 59.4 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 71.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 71.4 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 61.9, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 61.9 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 64.5, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 64.5 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 57.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 57.4 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 57.0, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 57 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 62.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 62.3 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 61.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 61.4 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 56.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 56.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 55.3, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 55.3 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 59.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 59.4 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 73.5, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 73.5 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 62.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 62.6 (a score, not a probability).
The page “Policy on Disruptive Social Behaviour”, page 1 mentions the person: “…sition: Zubair Ata, Tina Hameed, Khadijah Salman Ghani, Zain Khan, Anam Amama, Bushra Munir, Farzana Mirza, Nusrut Akbar, Syeda Raffia Ali, Muhammad Arshad, Altaf Qadri, Ahmed Ozaif, Muhammad Rauf, Afzaal Tarrar & Moniza Hamid.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.
A caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”, page 7 names the person: “Standing Left to Right: Waleed Hassan (Assistant HM Monnoo), Ahsan Mahmood (Assistant HM Saigol), Malik Saeed Baghoor (Assistant HM Monnoo), Muhammad Jawad Dastagir (Assistant HM Monnoo) Sitting Left to Right: Sarmad Khan (Assistant HM Saig”
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 66.1, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 66.1 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 62.0, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 62 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 68.9, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 68.9 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 58.9, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 58.9 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 64.6, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 64.6 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 68.4, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 68.4 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 71.2, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 71.2 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 69.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 69.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 57.9, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 57.9 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 64.8, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 64.8 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 64.7, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 64.7 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 56.0, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 56 (a score, not a probability).
A face in this photograph looked like the person's in a similarity search (basis: search similarity, grade: candidate; similarity score 70.0, which is not a probability). Compared with the person’s face as named in a caption in “boarding handbook 2026 27”. It is a suggestion, not an identification.
Basis: search similarity, grade: candidate, similarity score 70 (a score, not a probability).
The page “Policy on Disruptive Social Behaviours”, page 1 mentions the person: “…Composition: Zubair Ata, Tina Hameed, Khadijah Salman, Zain Khan, Anam Amama, Bushra Munir, Farzana Mirza, Nusrut Akbar, Syeda Raffia Ali, Muhammad Arshad, Altaf Qadri, Ahmed Ozaif, Muhammad Rauf, Afzaal Tarrar & Moniza Hamid.” Nothing there says that this photograph shows them.